A passage was explained in church this morning (May 30, 2021) that I have never understood as full as I now grasp it.  So I will try to be a good messenger boy and hand on what I’ve learned.  Previously I had not connected the fasting part with the new wine part. 

The passages involved are Mark 2:18-22, Matthew 9:14-17 and Luke 5:33-39.

John’s disciples were questioning why they and the Pharisees fasted, but Jesus and His disciples did not.  The disciples of John said in effect, “The religious ideal which we have held to be true and which the Pharisees have evidently held to be true seems different from the religious ideal of Your disciples.” 1

As disciples of John, these men were likely very good, sincere men, but in this situation they were the self-appointed fun police.  Jesus’ disciples were not being spiritual enough.  They were having too much fun.  

John’s disciples were fasting, possibly out of an Old Covenant orientation as one of the godly disciplines of good Jewish men. Or possibly they were fasting because John, their leader, was in prison (Mark 1:14).     

A dose of asceticism – the belief that harsh treatment of the body and seriousness about life may lead to advanced spirituality – may also have been involved.  

Jesus’ disciples were a happy bunch.  He said in effect, “How can these men fast;  how can they be other than at peace when I am with them?”  The God-Man affirmed the right to merriment when it is caused by being with Him.  But after He was gone, fasting would be appropriate. 

In the Mosaic Law the only directed fast was on the day of atonement.2  After the Babylonian captivity, the Jews observed four additional fast.3  In Jesus’ time, the Pharisees fasted twice a week (Luke 18:12).  

Christ defended His disciples by talking about something opposite of the repentance and mourning that is associated with fasting. He talked about a wedding; some of which lasted a week.   Jesus compared His disciples to the guests at a wedding, where joyous feasting would be appropriate. It would be unthinkable for guests to fast at a wedding. 

In the passages mentioned above, before the fasting question, there was the calling of a hated tax collector – Levi.  Immediately Levi (also named Matthew) had a I’m-leaving-to-follow-Jesus; retirement-from-tax-collecting dinner party. Jesus was the Guest of honored.  He ate with Levi and his tax collector buddies, showing His acceptance of them and His interest. 4

Then our Lord illustrated what He was saying by talking about unshrunk patches and old wineskins.  If a patch – made of strong, new cloth — is sewed over a hole in a warn and weak garment, it will pull away from the old cloth, making the tear worse.  

And wine had to be put in new, flexible, expandable wineskins. Why? Because as juice ferments, it gives off gases and expands.  If a wineskin had already been stretched, it became dried and brittle, and unable to expand again.  

And just what was the Lord saying?   Why does our Lord move from fasting to feasting?  And on to new patches and the old wineskins?  What is being said?  This is the connection of fasting and feasting that had not been made for me until this morning.  

The God-Man was saying, “I am doing something which is totally new.  Trying to be an ascetic to earn extra credit with God is like sewing a new patch over weakened cloth – it won’t work.  It is like trying to put new wine in an old wineskin.”

 “You must adjust your thinking to move away from law and self-serviced salvation to grace.  Grace will rip up the old cloth of legalism and shatter the old wineskins of Jewish tradition.  What I am doing – the Gospel – is too expansive and alive and dynamic to be contained in the old wineskin of the previous spirituality. Indeed, the new wine of the Gospel bursts the bonds of self-serviced salvation.” 

“Do not attempt to measure this new thing by the old thing. The old was right as long as it was God’s will to use the old. But now the Gospel is the new movement God is doing.  There is new truth, new motives and new forces on the spiritual horizon.  You must not try to put the new into the narrow limits of the old.  The old is over; the new is here.”  

Out with the old, in with the new.


  1. Can’t remember where I got this wording, but it is not original to me.  
  2.  Leviticus 16:29, 31;   23:27-32;   Numbers 29:7
  3.  Zechariah 7:5;  8:19
  4.  The Lord Jesus Christ mixed with society; even with those who were regarded as sinful, but always as their Savior, not their buddy or their associate in the questionable.  

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s